BBahmni 한국어 매뉴얼검색
한국어 번역 완료
한국어English

Relationship between OpenMRS objects

Considering each encounter type as a type of service provided to patient. It is possible that more such relationships would be required. Since the data volume is less should we model this in a single table instead of separate table for each type of relationship. There should services around this data which can answer questions like as provided in the description below.

ObjectObjectNameDescription
LocationProgram (m)Program DepartmentsOn user login to a location, narrow down the programs which are serviced from that location
ProgramEncounter Type (m)Program ServicesEach program could have a list of encounter types and when saving an encounter the type is derived from it
LocationEncounter Type (m)Department ServicesEach location could have a list of encounter types, if no program is used then encounter type is picked based on the location
ProgramForm (m)Program FormsIn the context of a program, provide only the choice of forms associated to it. If it is less that 7 forms then we can display all of them instead of expecting user to favourite it
LocationOrder Type (m)Order PointsEach location may be responsible for fulfilling certain orders. On login to a location, order fulfilment application should be presented to the user.

Location, Program, ET, VT, Obs Forms, Order Type, Order Class, Provider

https://talk.openmrs.org/t/should-we-link-encounters-to-programs-using-encounter-types/2029

원문 정보

Bahmni Wiki · CC BY-SA 4.0

원문 보기 ↗